pods for primates: a catalogue of surfboards in australia since 1900
home catalogue history references appendix

Click for next item
surfresearch.com.au 
 dougal walker : the tri-fin, 1981 
 THE TRI - FIN
DID GOD MEAN IT TO BE ?

1. Thruster
The reason for the birth of the trl-fln is easy to see. Twin fins are great for small waves, being fast and manoeuvrable, but when put into tight spots on larger waves they become hard to control and subject to spinning out.

Single fins are the answer to the problem of power control, but are limited in their small wave perfor- mance. This is proved time and time again in high-level competition.

So the answer, you might say, is to ride a twin fin in small surf and a single in large; but if you try to put this into practice (as I have for the past six years), you will find it is about as easy to adjust to the difference as it is to surf with a broken leg. The solution is a combination of the two - the tri-fin.

Although the idea of three fins is not a new one, the concept of having both twin fin speed and single fin stability sharing equal prominence is a direction which, for some unknown reason, had never been tried before. in the past, three-finned boards had always been made with a normal single fin paralleled by two very small fins on each rail, or by a twin fin with one baby fin on the tail as a stabilizer.

Simon Anderson's ideas on the tri- fin were totally different. He wanted a board that would generate speed and manoeuvres as well as being able to get into the critical positions that Anderson is renowned for.

The ensuing result was a board which, to be quite honest, looked different if not weird. Many people at this stage, including myself, were sceptical, saying that it was just a gimmick and could not possibly work. Many reasons for its probable failure were put forward such as "creating drag" and "being too stiff" but once Simon was seen riding his new brainchild most critics were made to eat their words.

But still doubt remained as to how well the average surfer would perform on the new design as it is common knowledge that Simon is not exactly an average surfer and it may have been that a surfer of less power and agility would not have the same success.

I, along with a few of Simon's friends from Narrabeen, decided it was worth a go. I rode Simon's board a couple of times and found it to be extremely fast but the board was made for a chap Simon's size rather than little twelve-stone me.

I was interested enough to take Simon's idea to my own shaper, the number one seed at the hot Buttered factory, Ronnie Woodward. We decided to stick with Simon's basic planshape as well as fin sizae and placement, but to scale the whole board down somewhat. This board is 6'1" by 19 3/4", a winged squaretall.

My first surf on this board was memorable -4-5' lefts. Within two or three waves I seemed to have
adjusted to it and then started experimenting. I found I was able to stand with my back foot over the twin fins and get great drive in my bottom turns and cutbacks then being able to move my back foot to Just in front of the back fin and being able to make radical but controlled directional changes in hollow sections or coming off the top. This board I found to be a little less manoeuvrable than a twin fin but definitely looser than a single and the problem of tail drift found in twins was eliminated. Others who had tried the experiment were also pleased and the improvement in their surfing was obvious. Gradually tri-fins began to spring up in surfing "hotspots" such as Narrabeen, Newport and Manly In a similar fashion as twin fins did just before "twin fin madness" hit a couple of years ago. I was quite content to stick with this board and not experiment any more but this was changed when it hit a telegraph pole at 50 miles an hour after I had carelessly tied it to the car roof with just a leg rope. "LIfeline" was all that stopped me from doing myself in.

The next tri-fin I had made was directed for use in small waves with more thickness in the tail and less nose area. It was excellent in small waves but the extra area and thickness in the tallhad shortcomings in larger waves.

For this reason I had a rounded pin tail shaped with less area in the tall than my previous tri-fins. I found it performed very similar to a single fin except with greater manoeuvring speed. I have ridden tri-fins In waves ranging from 1-8' but I believe they are most advantageous in the 3-6' range. I feel to ride waves of 8' or bigger the reliable single fin is the only equipment to use but I find that the tri-fln is the best board for ali- round conditions and with continuing experimentation within the industry it has the potential to make the same impact on surfing as the twin fin revolution of the late 70's.

With surfers such as Simon Anderson, Tom Carroll and Mike Newllng surfing and ripping on tri-flns I think that potential Is definitely there.

Dougall Walker


2. Simon Thrusting


TRACKS Magazine,
May 1981  Number 128 Page 16.
Photographs :    1. Peter Simons   2. Chris Elfes.
NOTES
1. First entry in a two page design article titled Australian Unorthodox : The Religion of Oz Design.
2. Other entries  were...
Terry Fitzgerald's Drifta III,
Rod Hocker on Concaves and Fin boxes,
Geof McCoy Design,
Michael Rae on Flex tails,
Phil Byrne on Clinkers and a
Col Smith (Newcastle) interview about Channel Bottoms.
3..The rapid application of the design by other top riders and shapers.
Click for next item
surfresearch.com.au
home catalogue history references appendix