| home | catalogue | history | references | appendix |
|
On Sunday the
3rd of December, Ted Spencer won a trip to Hawaii with Air New Zealand.
The magazine
(our magazine) had given it as a prize for the WindanSea Invitational Contest.
The occasion
was the visit of the Californian WindanSea team on their South Pacific
Tour.
That Sunday was
pretty funny.
There were a
few arguments even though there were only six surfers going into the water.
Midget, Ted,
Russell, Bigler, Purpus and John Monie.
The eliminations
to find the final six had taken three days.
Or sort of.
The previous
Saturday had been used for heats at Long Reef.
The Sunday for
eating, drinking and speeches.
The Monday for
the semi-finals.
The finals waited
a week.
Actually most
of the competitors went miles from the scene of combat.
The north coast
beckoned and they got a bit of surf.
The south side
of Angourie especially.
Apparently the
Americans settled in a little better.
They impressed
most of the strines.
Purpus had a
fin first take off.
He'll probably
be remembered for it.
Skip Frye is
smooth and stylised.
Bigler stands
up very straight on the nose.
The girls seemed
happy.
Thor talks.
And tries to
sort out all the opinions into some sort of policy.
And sometimes
succeeds.
Actually in the
final it's pretty difficult.
The cameramen
are still on everyones' backs.
Though they have
to pay to be so.
The final goes
on.
Ted and Russell
start slowly.
Midget is consistently
consistent.
And good too.
He continues
to be.
Somehow Russ
fails to really click.
It's Ted who
gets about four of the larger longer rights.
It's enough to
let him win and he does.
It's a trip to
Hawaii.
What a far cry
from Palm Beach this small and sloppy day.
All the finalists
come out of the water and then we have the prize giving.
The trophies
are dozens of paper flowers.
No bakelite.
No chrome.
They have first
and second on them.
And third, but
they are all the same.
But the first
has the trip and it has all been very tense.
Somehow we all
get through the ordeal.
Then we know that
despite any crap, someone is going to Hawaii who does deserve it.
And we know that
there will be a next time for the contest.
And there will
be another Ted Spencer.
John Witzig
It was Sunday
and a southerly.
The Americans
were back in Sydney, ready for the finals of the WindanSea Invitational,
the heats of which had been held at Long Reef the previous weekend.
Semi-finals on
the Monday had reduced the field to six surfers: Australians Farrelly,
Spencer, Hughes and Money; and Americans Bigler and Purpus.
The finals were
to be held at Palm Beach, the beach farthest north of Sydney.
At high tide
the basin was deep, the waves too full.
I settled down
with the Sunday papers and waited for the contestants to arrive.
Most of the Americans
were already there, waiting; the Australian competitors, with their advantage
of local knowledge, arrive late at various intervals throughout the morning.
By 1.00 p.m.
the basin is working; long rights are swinging in about 100 yards north
from the southern headland.
The area is cleared
and the contestants are allowed in the water; they have time to make final
adjustments to their equipment.
Judges Young
and McTavish are out, ripping the surf, showing the contestants the standard
they expect.
Spencer paddles
out, hard turns and long nose rides.
Farrelly is carrying
his equipment onto the beach.
Hughes waxes
up, then rides a smooth track; recent winner of the Newcastle and Hunter
River Valley Championships, he has not yet been out of Australia and it
is easy to see that he wants to win. Bigler and Purpus are on the beach,
creating interest with their equipment and by their very presence.
On his arrival
in Australia veteran surfer Pete Peterson had said that the Australians
will find something worthwhile in American surfing.
Today will decide.
It is interesting
to note the variations in surfing equipment.
Farrelly has
two boards, both extremely small, light and wide backed; one has an accentuated
scoop out of the back top deck.
Spencer has a
very short pin tail, a large fin set about 12 inches from the back.
Money and Hughes
are riding the more conventional 9-ft. performance boards.
The American
equipment is different altogether, perhaps their surf demands length, I
do not know. Purpus has a rather large, thin-backed, wide-nosed board,
the widest point being about one-third from the tip, from there it takes
a long but gradual taper to the back.
Bigler is on
a somewhat shorter but basically same shaped board.
From the first
wave I can see that both Bigler and Purpus are better surfers than I had
first given them credit for, but it is hard to judge, as their brand of
surfing is entirely different.
They show that
stunt riding does have a place in contest surfing.
Purpus in particular
pulls off some amazing manoeuvres, manoeuvres that are just not seen in
Australia, let alone in Australian contests.
One of the more
regular stunts is the fin first take-off; he stands up, fin digs in, he
revolves with the board and comes out right way round and, more often than
not, hanging five.
I notice from
the public's reaction that he is their champion.
I doubt whether
the judges will see it the same way.
Both Bigler and
Purpus are, by Australian standards, awkward.
With their longer
boards they are severely handicapped in vertical movement on the wave;
also, a forehand or backhand turn takes more effort than the Australians
with their lighter and smaller boards.
The accentuated
body movements of the Americans, necessary in order to get their manoeuvres
completed, gives them a ...
Page 22
... clumsy appearance.
It is only on
the nose that they resemble the Australian surfer.
Bigler comes
through some beautiful sections, high up on the face, stiff-legged, on
the tip.
Purpus shows
tenacity as he semi-crouches on the nose and sticks there, stalling and
accelerating by weight displacement.
There is no doubt
that the Americans treat contest surfing in a completely different light
to the Australians.
They seem to
concentrate on accomplishing a particular manoeuvre, of following it through
and holding it as long as possible.
In comparison
the Australians look smooth and confident, they do not play tricks with
the wave but suck all it has to offer and leave it, drained, on the beach.
A year of hard
competition has sharpened the Midget's competitive touch and from the start
it is evident that he is the force to beat.
Spencer starts
slowly but ends strongly.
Physically more
powerful than Farrelly, he is driving deeper into the sections, harder
into the cutbacks.
Under, over,
on top of, Ted Spencer is a top proponent of the modern Australian style,
a hard and fast-moving competitor.
Hughes' deceptively
easy style whipped him through some hard sections for some fine nose rides
but leaves him slightly behind in the run for the money.
It is a hard pick;
over the 40 minutes I would not hesitate in giving it to Farrelly, but
the contest was to be decided over the best 7 waves.
Spencer had done
some hard and spectacular surfing on two of his larger waves, coming through,
on the nose, whipping his board from top to bottom with a powerful knee
action.
I watched as
the judges totalled.
Four judges and
their results are worth noting.
| Nat Young
1. Spencer 2. Farrelly 3. Bigler |
Bob McTavish
1. Hughes 2. Farrelly 3. Spencer |
Skip Frye
1. Farrelly 2. Spencer 3. Hughes |
Micky Munoz
1. Spencer 2. Farrelly 3. Bigler |
It is so close.
A discussion
is called, it is agreed that on 40 minutes Farrelly had won, but that the
contest was over 7 waves and the contestants having been told this, it
is not practical for a wider points margin to operate.
Spencer had top
scored on two sheets; Spencer had won, Farrelly second, Hughes third.
The judges do
not like to hassle over the scores, most believing surfing to be an art
form and find something aesthetically wrong in deciding a winner in such
a way, there on the sand, the stakes a trip to Hawaii.
Frye and Munoz
backed the American judging system of time and distance.
Here was a positive
winner, you set a surfer a task and he gets it done; if a surfer knows
he had to get a 10-second nose ride then he can train, prepare himself
to perform this manoeuvre.
If he fails then
he loses the contest, no hassle, every surfer knows where he stands.
It is easy to
see where the American contest approach originates, it is inherent in ...
Page 24
... their judging
system.
Our verbal arguments
are not so strong, we are armed with bits of paper representing 40 minutes
of surfing, and yet we are arguing over a winner, unable to decide.
The Americans
have good logic, a nice tidy result is the result of their system.
On the other hand,
our surfers have shown themselves distinctly superior.
True, the American
system might give a positive result, but a restrictive wave system acts
as a clamp on an individual's style.
Our position
loses in verbal argument but comes out on top if you view surfing as an
art form. Perhaps the Americans see surfing as an art, but surfing contests
as a specialist sport.
Perhaps, after
all, we are on the wrong track; for it does seem cheap when guys go in
and surf it out and then the winner is decided on split hairs; but that's
it, I believe our system is the best of a bad lot. I do not believe that
a contest winner should be a specialist performer.
In a contest
we should be looking for the best all-round performer, not the best at
some particular manoeuvre.
Surfing is beautiful
and a surfing contest should try to reflect this as much as possible; let
the technocrats go back to the office, I already work there five days a
week.
Pete Peterson
was right.
I did learn a
lot from the Americans. their contest approach, their logical judging methods.
They do have
something to offer; we are all contributors to a great sport.
The WindanSea
Invitational was a good show and I know at least one surfer who does not
have any doubts as to our present judging system: Ted Soencer, as he wings
his way to Hawaii, for waves, enjoyment and perhaps a contest or two.
Lester Brien
![]() |
Windansea Invitational Surfing Contest. Surf International Volume 1 Number 3, February 1968, pages 20 to 24 . Image left:
|
| home | catalogue | history | references | appendix |